Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Publication of articles in Resonansi: Rekayasa Sosial, Manajemen dan Inovasi is dependent solely on validity, relevance, and coherence as judged by our editors and peer reviewers. Reviewers also assess whether the writing is clear, the methodology is appropriate, and whether the work represents a valuable contribution to community service and innovation. Resonansi highly appreciates the efforts and constructive feedback provided by its reviewers.

Initial evaluation of manuscripts
The Editor first evaluates all submitted manuscripts within a maximum of three weeks. In rare cases, exceptional manuscripts may be accepted at this stage. Manuscripts rejected at this stage are those considered insufficiently original, methodologically flawed, or outside the aims and scope of Resonansi. Those that meet the minimum criteria are forwarded to expert reviewers for further assessment. The full review process usually takes up to 14 weeks.

Type of peer review
Submitted manuscripts are generally reviewed by two to three experts in relevant fields. They are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is methodologically sound, coherent, and provides a meaningful contribution to community engagement and innovation. Resonansi applies a blind peer review method to ensure objectivity and fairness.